A war-driven oil shock has once again exposed shipping’s vulnerability to fossil fuel dependence and reinforced the need to shift to low- and zero-emission bunker fuels.
The ongoing Middle East conflict and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz have roiled global oil and gas markets. The front-month ICE Brent crude futures contract topped $100/bbl earlier this week, a staggering $27/bbl rise from around $73/bbl before the war started.
For bunker buyers, the fallout has been painful.
Conventional fuel availability has tightened at major hubs like ARA and Singapore. Bunkering in Fujairah and Khor Fakkan has been thrown into uncertainty over fuel loadings.
Rallying crude prices, bunker supply squeezes and surging demand have sent bunker prices into a frenzy this month. VLSFO and HSFO benchmarks have shot up by $268–314/mt in Rotterdam and by $405–617/mt in Singapore. Singapore’s LSMGO price has surged $1,112/mt higher so far this month, pushed up by a $344/mt gain in low-sulphur gasoil futures and severely tight supply.
This fallout from the war has once again exposed shipping’s vulnerability to geopolitical shocks and conventional fuel supply disruptions.
“The Middle East crisis has clearly shown that reliance on a small number of petrostates for global trade and global energy security is potentially outdated,” Em Fenton, senior director for climate diplomacy at Opportunity Green, told ENGINE.
“Actually what we should be looking towards is a just and equitable transition to a globally decentralised energy economy that will support the shipping, or even the aviation industry, and ensure net-zero emissions. And I think that [the Middle East crisis] we’re seeing at the moment is a very good argument to invest in truly net-zero alternative fuels.
Get More Info : Merchant Marine Jobs
Website : https://seajob.net/
Contact Us : Marex sea job
